Untested hypothesis in a clinical trial protocol d.Never waste an opportunity? COVID-19 and Kodak.Jaguar Land Rover loses trade mark battle over Lan.No CJEU reference (yet) as Mannheim Court grants i.Should a pseudonym be changed: George Eliot, Mar.Book Review: Law, Technology and Cognition.IPKat Reader Discount: UIC John Marshall Law Scho.Keeping up with Dutch patent litigation: Half-year.: IP implications of 3D printing, a new.Rick Ross wins legal beef with 50 Cent: the Second.When free-riding someone else's brand might be a w.Rat Pack / RatPac – Not All Trade Mark Judges are.UK patent exams update: Major changes to invigilat.BREAKING: UKSC upholds decision in Unwired Planet.Copyright, Trademark, International IP, and Trespa.Beijing IP Court: let’s talk about short video cop.
The legal nature of Article 17 of the Copyright DS.Repurposed fabric face coverings - what options ar.Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow. It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment. All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog.